Tuesday, 11 December 2012

Discuss the representation of class and status in the clip from Cranford


Discuss the representation of class and status in the clip from Cranford

The difference in class and status between the characters can be clearly noted. The mise en scene in this clip helps to show the difference between the characters. For example the audience automatically know Harry is poor and off a low status as he is shown to not be wearing any shoes at the beginning of the clip.  His clothes are dull in colour and appear to be of a low quality and dirty. The image of Harry easily transfers to the entire lower class during that period of time, we know this as when the audience are shown the rest of Harry’s family they are all in dark, dirty clothes. In comparison Mr Carters clothes look of a lot high quality, this shows the audience that he is off a high class and can afford to buy more expensive clothing. This can be said also for the other upper class characters; they are all shown to be in clothes that can be assumed are expensive when in comparison to a lower class character. The two environments the characters are shown in also show how class and status differ between the characters. Harry for example is shown to be living in some kind of shack like house; the audience first see the dull exterior which carries on inside the house. The house is very dim in lighting, this the lack of money the family has as they cannot afford things people would class as necessities such as lighting as they are only showed to have a candle on the table. The audience also get an insight into the cramped conditions Harry would be living in are 5 people are shown to be living in this tiny space. In comparison the environment Mr Carter lives in appears to be a lot better.  We are first shown Mr Carters office which in comparison appears bigger than the house Harry lives in. The later shot of the house shows the audience that Mr Carter is of a high social class; he is shown having people working for him even though he is just Lady Ludlow’s land agent he carries more social status than others. The sympathy Mr Carter shows to Harry by giving him food and a job my show that he was once of a similar situation. This could be shown when Mr Carter tells Harry that he can still turn his life around. Lady Ludlow contrasts the image of upper class, as even though her looks are better than those of the lower class people, she doesn’t have the same spark and energy the other characters. Lady Ludlow carries some characteristics of Miss Havisham, through the way she dresses.

The continuity editing throughout this clip also helps to show class and status. At the beginning of the clip when the camera follow Harry through the woods the audience gets the impression that he’ll be an important character as the focus is on him. The beginning scene also helps the audience get a feel for the environment as the camera shows the dark and gloomy wooded environment. The later shot reverse shot between Harry and his father show the father’s disapproval to the fact his son is trying to be educated. These show his own embarrassment of not being educated. The shot reverse shot used between Harry and Mr Carter show Mr Carter’s shock at the way Harry reacts. For example when Harry begins to lick his hand there is a shot reverse shot that shows his reaction that Harry is trying to get salt from the palms of this hands. A shot reverse shot is later used again when Harry asks what an ice room is, this time it shows the confusion on Harry’s face as it is a known word for Mr Carter. While the party is being set up there are straight edits that show how all the different people are working in order to create a party for the upper class.

There is a low angled shot of Lady Ludlow on the stairs; this shows the audience she is of a high status than the others in the scene as she is higher up than them. It can also be known to the audience that Mr Carter is a lower status that Lady Ludlow as he allows her to walk away first and his back a bit from her. While Lady Ludlow is on the stairs the audience can see two butlers waiting by the doors, this again shows Lady Ludlow’s high social status as she has people waiting on her. When Mr Carter is first brought into the scene there is a mid shot of his boots. This contrasts to the first shot of Harry in which he is bare foot. This shows how Mr Carter is wealthy and of a higher status as he is wearing boots that look expensive, while Harry wore no shoes and was later given a second hand pair of boots. A lot of camera angles are used to show status as authority in this clip, one being when the Doctor rides in on a horse there is an extreme long shot that makes his seem important as all the attention is on him. The audience also see how Harry’s social status makes him appear weaker, this is shown when he is laying on the floor and there is a high angled shot. The difference in class can also be seen when there is a long shot of Mr Carter and Harry walking away, this shows the difference in how they dress as mainly the audience notices that Harry isn’t wearing shows and Mr Carter is. It can also be commented on that Mr Carter has grabbed hold of Harry showing that maybe he doesn’t trust to him run away, this could be because he feels like lower class children don’t have the morals to do what there told and that Harry would run away, so he doesn’t get in trouble, as he cares for his family and they wouldn’t cope without him. The establishing shot in Mr Carters office shows how the two characters environments differ, even though Mr Carters office isn’t as lavish as Lady Ludlow’s house it’s a great improvement on Harry’s house.

The main difference between the sound in this clip would be between the way in which the characters talk. Lady Ludlow and Mr Carter talk better than Harry’s family as they would have had some kinds of education.  The ways in characters communicate with each shows the vulnerability of the lower class. For example when Mr Carter finds Harry in the green house he automatically defends himself in the hope of not getting in trouble. This could show that the lower class are always thought to be doing wrong. When Harry is walking up to the house as well as he is exploring the green house there is eerie non diegetic music in the background. This changes and there are noticeable piano keys in the background when Harry sees the grapes hanging down, this draws the audience’s attention as they wonder whether or not Harry will take the fruit. There is sad background music when Harry falls to the ground licking his hand; this makes the audience feel pity for Harry. While the staff are setting up for the party there is again background music, this time the music sounds like it would suit a upper class environment which shows the audience what kind of event the staff are setting up.

Monday, 10 December 2012

How is age represented in the clip from Monarch of the Glen?


How is age represented in the clip from Monarch of the Glen?


The main younger character in this clip catches the audiences’ attention from early on in the clip. When she first comes on to the screen there is a long shot which then tracks her as she is walking up to the younger man in the scene. This already shows the audience that she must be of some importance as the camera in lingering on her. She has in conversation with the younger man in with she says ‘there’s something I need to speak to you about’ the audience would assume that something has gone between the characters; maybe some kind of relationship through the way in which she’s says it. The younger man is working when Amy comes in to the scene, he then stops when she comes over, this could show the audience that a younger character doesn’t see the importance of work and a conversation would take priority. Compared to the other people shown at the begging of the clip Amy’s causal top and jean outfit doesn’t look as though she is prepared to work like everyone else, this again reiterates that a younger character wouldn’t know the importance of work. Later on in the clip when Amy is asked if she can drive there is a mid shot when she says ‘of course, I passed first time’   Amy seems confident and arouses no reason for the audience to suspect she’s lying. The audience learn she has lied when there is a panning shot of her in the car, the audience her hear saying ‘or is it clutch, accelerator , ignition’ this tells the audience she doesn’t know what she’s doing. This keeps the audience gripped to the scene as she starts the car and drives away as they wonder whether or not she’ll be able to do it. There is a long shot of Amy driving the car away, the camera does not follow the car, this may have been done to make the audience wonder whether or not she’ll crash the car, or if she’ll be ok. The car crash is diegetic sound, this is known as the character in the scene all react to the sound by running out of camera view to help Amy. By the camera not moving it could show the other characters didn’t expect Amy to lie to the crash came as a surprise. During the confrontation with Amy head teacher the audience see how Amy’s age makes her seem vulnerable. This is shown when the family crowd around her, this makes it look like they are trying to protect her. This is shown through a mid shot when the younger boy says ‘you’re still at school’ and Amy in shown in the arms of the woman. Later on in the clip Amy is again showed to the audience as being a weak character, due to her being younger than the other people in the situation this is when she is having a confrontation with the middle aged man, there is an over the shoulder shot which makes her appear lot smaller and weak than the man. This may make the audience feel pity for her as she looks weak and alone. Amy portrays a typically teenage stereotype when she run off after not getting her own way, this is shown through a long shot as well as her shouting  ‘I hate you’ which makes her seem immature and act in the way the audience would accept a teenager to do. There is a straight edit which shows the unaffected facial expressions of the other people in the scene, showing their ages makes them more mature and not interested in her attitude.

The middle aged man in the clip is what the audience would typically expect of a middle aged working man. The first communication he has with the characters is when he says ‘all hands on deck’, this shows him as having a strong work ethic as he expects everyone to work and contribute to the project.  The old fashioned banjo music sets the scene of a calm, laid back environment as the non-diegetic music doesn’t build tension. It does set the scene of working, farm land as its music you would traditionally associate with hillbillies. This music starts again at the end of the clip when the man is working again, this could show that the man is happiest and most content when he is working. The way he dresses would make the audience assume he works on a farm or in manual work as his clothes are dark in comparison to Amy’s and they seem a lot more practical.  When he approaches Amy after the car crash there is a long shot of his holding Amy, looking down on her to see if she’s ok. This may show the character’s paternal instincts as he checks if she’s ok, before finding out what happened.  He is shown as being more level headed than the younger man, this could be to do with his age and him having more life experience.  When the head teacher says she is only 16, the younger men seems shocked and agitated, were as the middle aged man steps back from the situation and tries to find out what was going on. Later on in the clip the audience see how age affects authority when the man is talking to Amy. There is an over the shoulder shot in which the man looks more powerful and authoritative than Amy. This is shown when he says ‘I want you ready to leave when I get back’ this shows the audience that he is pulling the strings and decides what’s going on.  The audience also see what he pulls the strings during the editing in which the audience see a shot –reverse – shot. This shot shows the audience that he is in control of the situation as he is able to deal with Amy as well as what’s going on outside. It also shows the difference in age when Amy has nothing to do but run off shouting, the man doesn't seem phased by Amy’s behavior.

The older man has similarities to the middle age man in the sense that he is shown as being more level headed than Amy. He does also differ from the middle aged man; this is shown in how he dresses talks and acts. The clothes he wears are lot more formal than the clothes the middle aged man wears. This shows the audience the difference in how age effects in way you dress.  Considering the arrived to collect Amy the fact he accepts the drink of Brandy maybe be shocking for the audience, as it would be expected he wouldn't drink on the job. The way in which he talks to Amy differs from how the rest of the characters do, when he first sees Amy he says ‘I might of know’ the audience can  easily notice his anger, not only through his tone of voice, but through his tense fists.

Thursday, 6 December 2012

Working Title

  • Founded in 1983 by Tim Bevan  and Sarah Radclyffe
  • Now co owned byEric Fellner and Tim Bevan
  • Headquaters in London, United Kingdom
  • Other locations in Ireland and the United States of America
  • Key people in the company - Tim Bevan, Sarah Radclyffe, Eric Fellner, Liza Chaasin, Debra Hayward and Natascha Wharton
  • Parent companies were PolyGram (1991-1999) and currently Universal Studios (2000-present)
  •  In 1992, PolyGram became the company's corporate backer.
  • contractually allowed to produce any film with a budget of up to $35 million, on a practical basis, Bevan and Fellner consult with studio executive at Working Title's parent company NBCUniversal.
  •  In 1999, PolyGram was sold to Seagram and merged with MCA Music Entertainment, to form Universal Music Group. PolyGram Films was sold and folded into Universal Studios in 1999.
  • Subsidiaries - WT2 Prodcutions and Working Tiltle Television
  • In 1999, Bevan and Fellner launched a subsidiary company named Working Title 2 Productions, commonly known as WT2. The company is an independent film production arm run by Natascha Wharton, and has produced films that include Billy Elliot, Shaun of the Dead and The Calcium Kid
  •  It produces feature films and several television productions, including films starring comic actor Rowan Atkinson ( Johnny English reborn)
  • Working Title Films, the UK film production company behind box office hits including Four Weddings and a Funeral and Shaun of the Dead
  • Working Title Television is a joint venture with NBCUniversal and will be based in London and Los Angeles. NBCUniversal is Working Title's parent company
  • The company released a modernised version of the children's novels, The Borrowers in December 2011 and Abi Morgan's adaptation of Birdsong in January 2012.
Films
  • Tinker Taylor Soldier Spy (Decemeber 9th 2011) - In the bleak days of the Cold War, espionage veteran George Smiley is forced from semi-retirement to uncover a Soviet agent within MI6. Budget: £20,000,000 (estimated) Total gross: £24,877,160
  • Contraband ( January 13th 2012)- To protect his brother-in-law from a drug lord, a former smuggler heads to Panama to score millions of dollars in counterfeit bills. Budget: $40,000,000 (estimated) Total gross: $96,262,212 
  • Big Miracle (February 3rd 2012)- In small town Alaska, a news reporter recruits his ex-girlfriend - a Greenpeace volunteer - on a campaign to save a family of gray whales trapped by rapidly forming ice in the Arctic Circle. Budget:  $40,000,000. Total gross: $19,966,230 (USA)
  • Anna Karenina (November 16th 2012) - Set in late-19th-century Russia high-society, the aristocrat Anna Karenina enters into a life-changing affair with the affluent Count Vronsky. Budget: £31,000,000. Total gross: $15,242,363
  • Les Miserables (Decemeber 25th 2012)- In 19th-century France, Jean Valjean, who for decades has been hunted by the ruthless policeman Javert after he breaks parole, agrees to care for factory worker Fantine's daughter, Cosette. The fateful decision changes their lives forever. Budget: $61,000,000 Total gross: unknown

Film4 Facts



  • Film4 was originally known as Film four when established in 1998 as channel 4’s second channel but was for subscription only.   
  • Channel 4 is a production house company, who's funding comes from adverts/commercial funding.
  • FILM 4 - "committed to enhance the British film making industry by nurturing and funding new talent"
  • Film 4 has a niche (very specific small audience)
  • It was then followed by many other channel 4 further programmes who time shared the air of blockbuster films.
  • In 2006 film four modified its name to Film4 and also became a free digital viewing channel and started producing many adverts with celebrities in weird situations to stress and intrigue the audience that this is the only channel to watch free movies continuously.
  • Tessa Ross became the Controller of film4 in 2004 and head of TV drama for Channel 4.
  • Film4 is very heavily linked with Channel 4. Channel 4 financed in the helping of production in such films as “The Crying Game” and “Madness of King George”. Channel 4 also decided that there side film channel would be made free on digital networks, therefore becoming the only free film program to boost ratings.
  • Film 4 are currently on some large projects including Tyrannosaur, which Film4 backed in production and distribution closely working with Warp X and Inflammable films. This movie is an example of how Film4 help broadcast and produce English films and not just Hollywood Blockbusters as this was the first film ever to be directed by Paddy Considine. Also Film4 are in the final stages of distributing their own creation of Random originally a theatre play by director Debbie Tucker Green. It is being regularly advertised on channel 4 and competitions have started to try and attract people to see the film in cinemas.
  • Film 4 produces about 6 films a year and works along their subsidiary Warp X
  • Less of the budget is spent on distribution, because the films can be advertised on their own and parent companies TV channels.
  • They have won 5 Oscars in 4 years & 3 BAFTA's in 2007. 8.3 million AB Cl's a month, with an upmarket (42%) and male (55%) profile.
  • Successful Films include - Slumdog Millionaire/127 Hours/Four Lions/This Is England/Trainspotting
  • Film 4 work closely with specific actors and directors such as Danny Boyle's/Martin McDonagh/Steve McQueen/Peter Mullan/Chris Morris
  • Film 4 recently launched Film 4.0 - digital/online arena
  • Film 4.0's aim will be to find new talent and discover new ways of making, marketing and distributing films and engaging new audiences online in a multi platform environment.
    Films:
    • Johhny English - It was wrote in 2009, worte by the same people of James Bond which grossed $160 million. Rowan Atkinson starred and the sequal was released in september 2010.
    • Wild-Child - Budget of $20 million. Filmed at Cobham Hall. Was marketed on radio stations, social networking sites and TV adverts - was a financial flop with 2.2 mill opening weekend.
    • The Soloist - Based on true Story. Budget $60 mill. Based on books and articles/directed by Joe Wright. Produced by Gary Foster & Russ Krasnof. Grossed $31,720,158 mill. Paramount helped distribute through Dreamworks animation and Universal Pictures. Released a year later than planned, therefore lost oscar potential
      Written by Stephen Hare